|Wednesay, October 10, 2007
|The following article appeared in
The Michigan Daily, and is being archived here as fair use
with full credit for the purpose of educating the public about events
surrounding the Arab boycott of Israel. Thank
reports: By a landslide, co-op Rejects Israel Boycott
| By a landslide, co-op rejects Israel boycott
People's Food Co-op board members say they're still open to debate
By: Daniel Strauss, Daily Staff Reporter
Despite the efforts of a group called Boycott Israeli
Goods, products made in Israel will remain on the shelves of the People's Food
Co-op of Ann Arbor.
At a meeting of the co-op's Board
of Directors last night, officials announced the outcome of a vote to determine
whether the organization should boycott Israeli products. The final vote was
262 members in favor of the ban and 866 opposing it.
The motion to boycott Israeli goods started this
summer when Boycott Israeli Goods proposed a referendum to the co-op's board.
The group aimed to protest what it said was cruel treatment of the Palestinian
people by the Israeli government.
co-op's Board of Directors rejected the proposed referendum, the group
collected 600 signatures - enough to force a vote by co-op members. A majority
of the votes was needed to implement the ban.
announcing the vote tally yesterday evening at Hathaway's Hideaway, a meeting
place on South Ashley Street, People's Food Co-op President Linda Feldt said
she received hundreds of e-mails and had conversations about the issue with
both passionate supporters and opponents of the boycott. She said she doesn't
expect that to end.
"If someone would like to
challenge the vote, I will be in touch tomorrow," she said.
Another boycott of Israeli goods could still be
proposed in the future, said Kevin Sharp, the co-op's marketing and member
services director, in a phone interview yesterday.
The audience at the meeting was a mix of Boycott
Israeli Goods members and opponents of the ban.
Although he was satisfied with the outcome, Stephen
Pastner, a visiting associate professor of anthropology at the University,
clenched his fists during the board meeting. Pastner said he was furious at the
motivations of the boycott's supporters.
angry at these people because they represent a perversion of everything I
believe in," Pastner said. "I consider myself a political progressive: they
have co-opted the name of being progressive. They call themselves Jewish,
witnesses for peace, but they're anti-Semites, and they're not for peace."
Ann Arbor resident Elaine Rumman, who said she is
Palestinian, spoke against the outcome of the vote when addressing members of
the board. She said the Israeli government uses its power over the Palestinian
"I'm not happy at all for sure
because they can do anything with power," she said. "The Gaza is really shut
off from all ways, I mean - why're they doing that?"
Some members of Boycott Israeli Goods said the outcome was skewed by the way
the voting and balloting were organized. During a question-and-answer session,
audience members repeatedly asked questions the possibility of ballot fraud.
Ed Morin, a Boycott Israeli Goods member, said the
ballots could have affected the outcome because they were confusing, but he
said there were other factors in play.
have been this lopsided if that were the only cause," said Morin, who ran
unsuccessfully for the University Board of Regents in 2006 on the Green Party
ticket. "I think a bigger factor is that we had opponents who were clearly
supporting Israel unconditionally - in other words, Israel was their chief
value, and they weren't going to subject Israeli behavior to any moral
He said many people were likely
influenced to vote against the proposal by the members of the board who were
concerned about the co-op's image.
"If the ballot
passes, we'll lose a lot of members, we'll lose business, and we'll lose
money," he said, imagining the board's rationale. "It's not good for the co-op,
and therefore this sort of thing shouldn't be happening here."
© Copyright 2007 Michigan Daily